Govt may ask Reliance to halve Maha Mumbai SEZ

ET reports

THE government may ask Reliance Industries to scale down the size of its proposed multi-product Maha Mumbai SEZ from 10,000 hectares to 5,000 to avoid dislodging farmers and villagers unwilling to relocate. The decision is expected to be taken at the next meeting of the empowered group of ministers (eGoM) on SEZs.

With rising protests from farmer groups, political parties and small businesses intensifying in the state, the government’s proposal could be seen as an attempt to prevent a repeat of the violence in West Bengal’s Nandigram.

“If Reliance scales down its operations by half in Maha Mumbai, the sensitive areas could be excluded from the zone and peace restored,” the official said. The Board of Approval for SEZs, in an earlier meeting in August last year, had observed that land planned for building the Maha Mumbai SEZ was much more than required. With the situation hotting up, the eGoM headed by foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee is expected to ask Reliance to reduce the size of the SEZ, sources said. The date for the eGoM, which will also decide on the future course of the SEZ policy, has not yet been firmed up. It is being widely speculated that the meeting will take place only after the UP assembly elections are over.

I see a paradox in special economic zone. It's supposed to mean less government control on operations of businesses - tax incentives, less stringent labour, environmental laws etc. But, day after day, i only see more government intervention - including land acquisitions by government agencies, police atrocities etc. This is another example. There is a blog that tracks SEZ's and it's so aptly named. Check out.

Imports and fear of abundance

FE reports

The government on Friday said it would consider reducing duties on luxury goods imports without affecting the domestic market.

“If the industry comes up with some items on which duties can be brought down without hurting the local industry, we will be happy to look at it,” commerce and industry minister Kamal Nath said. Defending the high tariff on imports of goods like leather and textile products, the minister said it was to ensure that cheap imports from countries like China does not flood the local market.

He also said that the duty on high value goods can be brought down on the lines of a model which would be adopted in the case of wines and spirits. Nath said, “We recognise that duties on wines is high. We are looking at lowering tariffs. We are in the advanced of negotiations and the issue will be addressed.”

This sentence is so revealing, is it not? "If the industry comes up with some items on which duties can be brought down..."

Flooding the local market is another. Please do have a look at Bastiat quote in this earlier post

Exporting onion

Reuters reports

India on Friday cut by $40 a tonne the minimum price at which onion can be exported from the country, aligning it with the fall in local prices and giving a thrust to exports.

The National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a government agency, had in February raised the minimum export price (MEP) by about 30 percent across regions, to discourage exports amid surging local prices.

"Now, arrivals have improved and prices have fallen across the country. So, we decided to reduce the minimum export price," a senior NAFED official told Reuters from New Delhi.

Tyre manufacturers seek ban on rubber futures

BS reports

Stating that rubber futures are not helping in "price discovery" and "risk management", tyre manufacturers have demanded a ban on forward trading of the commodity.

In a letter to the Commerce, Industry and Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion Secretaries, the Automotive Tyre Manufactuers Association (ATMA) has said the demand for ban on rubber futures is no different from the bar imposed by the Centre on forward trading in urad, tur, rice and wheat. The New Delhi-based ATMA is the apex body of tyre makers in the country.

"The steep increase in the price of rubber has imposed severe financial burden on the tyre industry. Further, since rubber is the prime raw material for the production of items such as chappals, battery boxes, condom, hoses and thousands of other items, the steep price increase has forced hundreds of manufacturers to close shutters and most others are at the verge of closure or facing a difficult time due to exorbitant increase in input costs," ATMA said in the letter.

New semi-conductor policy has place for only 2-3 fabrication units

BL reports

The Government has decided to allow only two or three companies to set up fabrication units in India with incentives specified under the semi-conductor policy.

However, it will permit ten companies to take benefit of the fiscal measures for manufacturing devices that include Liquid Crystal Displays (LCD), solar cells and storage devices, which essentially form part of the eco-system.

An Appraisal Committee comprising high-level officials from the Department of Information Technology and the Ministry of Commerce and Finance will decide on which companies will be given the incentives.

Notifying the semi-conductor policy, which was cleared by the Union Cabinet in January, Mr Dayanidhi Maran, Union Minister for Communication, Information and Technology, said, "We expect to attract investment of Rs 24,000 crore in this sector in the next three years. We are sure that many big players are willing to invest. Since we have the capacity for 2-3 fabrication units, we will have the choice to pick the best."

Can't say i was impressed with semi-conductor policy in first place, and so this is not to complain why restrict these incentives only to three players. It's more to do with the underlying assumptions. Just look at the last line. It's the same attitude that made our government to take it upon itself to decide how much should be produced and what. Todays ministers might talk as if they are for free markets - but their words speak louder ;-)

Privatisation is still relevant

The ever-sensible Ajay Shah writes in BS

But equally, there is no industry in India where the licence-permit raj hinders entry more than in the case of banking. At a time when the Indian economy is booming, and every kind of business is being created, the one industry where we see no new firms starting up is banking. This has surely got to do with government restrictions on entry.

There is absolutely no industry in India where the opening of branch offices by foreign firms and private firms requires permission from the government. When Ford operates in India, it has to obey rules on FDI, but after that, it never has to go back to the government to take permission to open offices. What is worse, all foreign banks—put together—are given permission to open 12 branches per year in the full country. There is no worse instance where contemporary Indian policy-making is animated by ideas from the 1960s.

Left parties up the ante against increase FDI cap in insurance

FE reports

The Left parties, however, re-iterated their stand on the issue saying that they were still opposed to the proposal of raising FDI limit in the sector. “We will not allow the government to raise the FDI limit.

If the government does so on its own, we are free to take a decision on the issue on our own,” CPI MP Gurudas Dasgupta told reporters after the meeting.

And thus unwittingly help the rent-seeking capitalists, they say they are against.